Legal Opinion

Exendine v. City of Sammamish

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 18, 2005No. 54570-1-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Michael and Patricia Exendine (the Exendines) challenge the jurisdiction of King County District Court (District Court) to issue search warrants to search their property for alleged violations of the city of Sammamish (City) civil code. RCW 3.66.060 grants district courts jurisdiction to issue search warrants for misdemeanor violations of city ordinances. We conclude the *577District Court had jurisdiction to issue the search warrants to search the Exendines’ property because, under the City’s municipal code, a willful violation of its civil code is a misdemeanor. We also conclude the trial…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. City of Seattle v. McCreadyWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Crosby v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. KlinkerWashington Supreme Court · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Spokane v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. City of Spokane v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Exendine v. City of SammamishCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. Donald And Kathleen Miller v. City Of SammamishCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. Exendine v. City of SammamishCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API