Smith v. Jungkind
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, Justice.
Appellee sued appellants for damages sustained by him as the result of an alleged intentional shooting of appellee by appellant, Dean Oscar Smith, while acting in the course of his employment with appellants, H. A. Fitzsimmons and Fitzsimmons Land and Cattle ’Company.
Upon the trial a jury, among other findings, found that: Dean Oscar Smith fired the shot that struck appellee ;■ that he fired the shot with intent to injure; that the shot was the proximate cause of appellee’s injuries; that at the time he fired the shot Smith was acting in the scope of his employment; that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Southern Surety Co. v. Nalle & Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Heath v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Le Sage v. PryorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1941
- Lesage v. PryorTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Blum Milling Co. v. Moore-Seaver Grain Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Spoljaric v. Percival Tours, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Jones v. Ray Insurance Agency, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
- Sears, Roebuck and Company v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Kone v. Security Finance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1958
- Schexnider v. Scott & White Memorial Hospital, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.