Legal Opinion
HICKS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 10, 2024No. 2:22-cv-00977Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TERMAINE HICKS : CIVIL ACTION : v. : NO. 22-977 : CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, MARTIN : VINSON, ROBERT ELLIS, ARTHUR : CAMPBELL, MARK WEBB, MICHAEL : YOUSE, FRANK HOLMES, DOUGLAS : VOGELMAN, KEVIN HODGES, DENNIS : ZUNGOLO, MARY BRIDGET SMITH : MEMORANDUM MURPHY, J. October 10, 2024 “A lawyer, as a member of the legal profession, is . . . a public citizen having a special responsibility for the quality of justice.”1 We expect — demand — that lawyers zealously advocate for their clients. But lawyers must not lose sight of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Marie Saldana v. Kmart Corporation Marie Saldana, in No. 99-4055Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- In Re: Cendant Corp., (Formerly Known as Cuc International, Inc.) Cendant Capital I Lester A. Goldstein, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated Welch & Forbes Inc., an Institutional Investment Manager, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Walter A. Forbes Cosmo Corigliano Anne M. Pember Merrill Lynch & Co. Chase Securities Inc. Henry R. Silverman v. Ernst & Young Cendant Membership Services, Inc. Casper Sabatino Steven P. Speaks Kevin T. Kearney Mary Sattler Howard SirotaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Eash v. Riggins Trucking Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.