Beidler v. Friedell
Supreme Court of Arkansas
APPEAL from Miller Circuit Court. Hon. C. E. Mitchel, Circuit Judge. The motion for a new trial is made no part of the bill of exceptions. 30 Ark., 585 ; 34 lb., 4®0; 39 lb., 483; 40 lb., 251. The bill of exceptions must show that it contains all the evidence. 2 Eng., 408; 17 Ark., 327; 35 lb., 41®-
1Opinion of the CourtEakin, J.
The complaint in this case was made before a justice of the peace of Miller county by Edwin Bancroft, as guardian of the minor heirs of Charlotte Bancroft, against the appellee, Beidler, showing that the guardian had obtained from the probate court, at the April term, 1881, an order to sell two certain town lots of the wards for their support and education, and that at the sales, which occurred on the twenty-fifth of May following, Beidler bid the sum of $1,680 for the lots, and was declared the purchaser. He declined, however, to perfect the sale and execute his obligation for the purchase…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Eaves v. MullenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Spade v. MortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Steele v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Harper v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Kretsinger v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.