Legal Opinion
United Drug Co. v. Parodney
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 9, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INCH, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings suit to obtain a decree forbidding tbe defendant from using tbe name “United Drug.” Defendant has duly answered. ’ Jurisdiction is based upon tbe diversity of citizenship of tbe parties, and same has been duly proved.
Tbe plaintiff is a Massachusetts corporation, resident in said state. Tbe defendant is a resident of tbe state of Hew York. Tbe complaint alleges unfair competition on tbe¡ part of tbe defendant by bis use of tbe said name “United Drug Exchange.” Ho money damages are sought. Tbe sole relief asked for is a permanent injunction, forbidding tbe…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- British-American Tobacco Co. v. British-American Cigar Stores Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Gulden v. ChanceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
- Mutual Export & Import Corp. v. Mutual Export & Import Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1917
- Wing v. McCallumDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1926
3Cited by4 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. of New Mexico, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Standard Oil Co. of Maine v. Standard Oil Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1930
- Stardust, Inc. v. WeissDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- Delilah P. v. Frank J. Bisignano, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2026