Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Gullo

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1984PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Alexander Vitale, J.

Motion by defendant Diocese of Rockville Centre (hereinafter Diocese) for summary judgment and a dismissal of the complaint is granted.

The infant plaintiff was seriously injured on vacant land owned by the Diocese when the dune buggy driven by the infant defendant in which the infant plaintiff was riding as a passenger hit a mound of dirt and flipped over.

In addition to alleging the negligence of the infant defendant and his parents, the complaint alleges that the Diocese was negligent in its supervision and maintenance of the vacant land by not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alvord & Swift v. Stewart M. Muller Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Sega v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Michalovic v. Genesee-Monroe Racing Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hardy v. GulloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API