Legal Opinion

Fryar v. Currin

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 30, 1984No. 0057PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge;

This appeal principally involves an accounting for commissions received pursuant to a lease agreement between the appellant B. W. Currin and the respondent Venigee C. Fryar. The trial court held that Fryar was entitled to one-fifth of the net proceeds from the operation of the New Independent Tobacco Warehouse and that Currin was entitled to a reimbursement for only one-half of the expenditures made by him for improvements on the warehouse and for additional equipment. We reverse and remand the issue concerning Fryar’s entitlement to a portion of the net profits and affirm the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Blakeley v. RabonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  3. Superior Automobile Insurance v. ManersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  4. Byrd v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Flair Broadcasting Corp. v. PowersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  2. Jacobs v. Service Merchandise Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  3. Rogers v. Salisbury Brick Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  4. Wallace v. Milliken & Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  5. Gamble, Givens & Moody v. MoiseCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API