Legal Opinion
Parkell v. Danberg
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 25, 2014No. Civ. No. 10-412-SLRPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBINSON, District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Donald D. Parked (“plaintiff’), an inmate at the Howard R. Young Correctional Institution, Wilmington, Delaware, filed his complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 He proceeds pro se and has been granted leave to proceed without prepayment of fees. Presently before the court are defendants’ motions for summary judgment and plaintiffs oppositions thereto. (D.I. 222, 224, 226, 237, 240, 242) The court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. For the reasons discussed, *344the court will grant defendants’ motions for summary…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jamie F. v. UnitedHealthcare Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020