Legal Opinion

Estate of McDonald

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1963PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The issue which confronts the court on this appeal is whether the county court, in construing the phrase “my children,” is constrained to stay within the four corners of the will because the phrase is clear and unambiguous, or whether it may deem the phrase ambiguous, in view of the adoption by Bethe of testator’s two children by testator’s first marriage, and consider extrinsic evidence to ascertain testator’s intent.

We start with the general principle that extrinsic evidence is usually not admissible to explain the word “children” appearing in a will. 57 Am. Jur., Wills, p. 692, sec. 1071.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re Moran's WillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Breese v. BennettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Lichter v. ThiersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Heard v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Will of BoeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dye v. BattlesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. In Matter of Estate of LohrCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  3. Smith v. ReinhartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. SchoendorfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Boerner v. BoernerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API