Legal Opinion

Sigvaris, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 17, 2017No. Slip Op. 17-60; Court 11-00532PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Choe-Groves, Judge:

This case addresses whether various models of graduated compression hosiery, arm-sleeves, and gauntlets (fingerless, glove-like articles worn on the hands) are specially designed for the use or benefit of handicapped persons and are therefore duty-free under the Nairobi Protocol to the Florence Agreement on the Importation of Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Materials (“Nairobi Protocol”) and the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”). 1 Before the court are cross-motions for summary judgment. See Pl.’s Mot. Summ. J., Dec. 21, 2015, ECF No.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  4. Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  5. Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Danze, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2018
  2. Sigvaris, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API