Legal Opinion

Commodore William Moss v. Walter E. Craven, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 26, 1970No. 22198PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner, a California prisoner, appeals from an order of the district court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

After an evidentiary hearing the district court found that “petitioner was properly represented by counsel and that he pleaded guilty with an understanding of the significance of the plea and the consequences stemming therefrom.” Based on the testimony adduced at the hearing, and the state court record, we cannot say that these findings are clearly erroneous. Knowles v. Gladden, 378 F.2d 761, 766-767 (9th Cir. 1967).

Petitioner contends that the state trial record was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Halliday v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States ex rel. Hughes v. RundleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Geza De Kaplany v. J. J. Enomoto, Director of California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  2. State v. HolsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. United States v. Randall Wilford PricepaulCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. Conley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Kenneth Sailer v. J. B. GunnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API