Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sorensen v. Farmers State Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1933No. 28829PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court for Hall county, decreeing claim of intervener against an insolvent bank to be a preferred claim payable in full out of the assets in possession of the receiver.

Briefly summarized, the evidence, which was stipulated, reveals that the intervener purchased from the Farmers State Bank of Wood River a cashier’s check for $3,000 which he indorsed and sent to a brother in Texas who in turn indorsed it and deposited it in a Texas bank which bank sent it to the issuing bank “for payment and immediate remittance.” When the cashier’s check…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fulton v. B. R. Baker-Toledo Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932
  2. State ex rel. Sorensen v. Farmers State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Liquidation of the State Bank of BinghamtonNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Marlboro Trust Co. v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
  3. McIlroy v. N.J. Title Guarantee Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  4. Mississippi Valley Trust Co. v. West St. Louis Trust Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Logan v. Farmers & Merchants BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API