Legal Opinion
State v. Flint
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1988No. 16266PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BISTLINE, Justice, and OLIVER, Judge,
Pro Tern.*
The defendant was charged with lewd conduct with a child under 16 years of age. The state moved for an order that defendant view the alleged victim’s testimony at the preliminary hearing through closed circuit television rather than being physically present in the courtroom. Following a hearing, the motion was granted. At the preliminary hearing over defendant’s objection, he was allowed only to observe the alleged victim’s testimony on closed circuit television from outside of the courtroom. His attorney was allowed to remain in the courtroom…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- United States v. John Fioravanti, Nicholas Panaccione, and Angelo Pepe, Nicholas PanaccioneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- People v. GainerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- United States v. Anthony C. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- State v. HaggardIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. LamphereIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. HernandezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
- State v. NorquayMontana Supreme Court · 2011
- Taylor v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.