Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Dresner v. County Court in and for County of Pueblo

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 29, 1975No. 26775PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

*375This original proceeding, in the nature of mandamus, was filed pursuant to the provisions of C.A.R. 21. The petitioners before the court are Thomas Padilla and a lawyer from the public defender’s office who represents him.1

The issues now before us center on the failure of the district attorney to present a grand jury indictment in open court and on an order quashing subpoenas directed to the district attorney, his assistants, and the foreman of the grand jury. We issued a rule to show cause and now discharge the rule.

The Padilla brothers were arrested on December 21, 1974, on charges of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  2. People v. FlorioNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. Hassan v. Magistrates' CourtNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Dear Wing Jung v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  5. Owen Walter Swepston v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Maddox v. River & Sea Marine, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Lucero v. GoldbergerColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People Ex Rel. Losavio v. GentrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. Gansz v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. Thomas v. County CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API