Legal Opinion
Watson v. Oceaneering International, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided September 26, 2005No. 04-1298-SLRPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On September 24, 2004, plaintiffs James R. Watson and his wife, Carolyn Watson, filed this suit against defendant Oceaneer-ing International, Inc. (“Oceaneering”) pursuant to the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 688, and general maritime law. (D.I.l) The Watsons seek maintenance and cure, damages resulting from Oceaneering’s Jones Act negligence, damages resulting from the vessel’s unseaworthiness, and damages due to loss of consortium. (D.I.l) Pending before this court is Oceaneering’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Morgan v. Almars Outboards, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2018
- Salvemini v. Air & Liquid Systems CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2025