Legal Opinion
Hinkley v. Baker
District Court, D. Maine
Decided November 21, 2000No. 2:99-cv-00286PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
SINGAL, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (Docket # 8). Alleging that Defendant sexually molested her while she was a child, Plaintiff asserts claims against Defendant under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as Maine state law claims for assault, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress and punitive damages. In his Motion to Dismiss, Defendant specifically challenges Counts I, II and IV. For the reasons discussed herein, Defendant’s Motion is…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Jorge Correa-Martinez v. Rene Arrillaga-BelendezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gomes v. University of Maine SystemDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
- Douglas v. Brookville Area School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Doe v. D'AGOSTINODistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- State v. ParsonsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- MORELLI v. ARMSTRONG SCHOOL DISTRICTDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.