Legal Opinion

State v. M.R.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 14, 2012No. 3D12-29Published

1Opinion of the CourtEmas, J.

The State appeals from an order granting M.R.’s motion to suppress statements *274made by M.R and a motion to suppress physical evidence seized from M.R. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

FACTS

M.R. was charged in a petition for delinquency with possession with intent to sell, manufacture, or deliver cannabis within 1000 feet of a school, in violation of section 893.13(l)(c)(2), Florida Statutes (2011). M.R. filed a motion to suppress physical evidence (marijuana seized from him following his arrest) and a motion to suppress two post-arrest statements. The trial…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API