Legal Opinion

Seabolt v. Hall

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 22, 2013No. S12A1632PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Melton, Justice.

Following the lower court’s grant of habeas corpus relief to Michelle Garner Hall, the State appeals, contending, among other things, that the trial court erred by applying a presumption of prejudice when reviewing Hall’s sole claim that she received ineffective assistance of counsel. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse.

Following a jury trial, Hall was convicted for the murder and aggravated assault of her husband, John Britt Hall. This Court affirmed on appeal, and, as set forth in Hall v. State, 287 Ga. 755 (1) *312(699 SE2d 321) (2010), the underlying facts of this case…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Turpin v. ToddSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  3. Chatman v. MancillSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  4. Reid v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  5. Battles v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Whatley v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Lewis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  3. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
  4. Hall v. Warden, Lee Arrendale State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
  5. Frederick Whatley v. Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API