Legal Opinion

Clark v. Continental Nat. Bank of Lincoln, Neb.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided November 26, 1949No. Civ. 3-49PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DELEHANT, District Judge.

Counsel for the plaintiff will prepare for entry as of this date an order recognizing and finding the familiar change in personnel in the plaintiff’s office and making appropriate substitution of the present incumbent thereof for the named plaintiff. See McGrath v. Manufacturers Trust Co., 70 S.Ct. 4.

For the rest, the facts are not in dispute, and the legal questions are not numerous. The case has been submitted to the court for final ruling and judgment upon the pleadings and certain additional or clarifying details reflected in the report of pretrial conference.

From…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Markham v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Central Union Trust Co. of NY v. GarvanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Stoehr v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Commercial Trust Co. of NJ v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Cummings v. Deutsche Bank Und DiscontogesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Brownell v. GebhardtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. First National Bank v. KirschmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Brownell v. EdmundsDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1953
  4. In Re Trusteeship Under Will of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  5. Kammholz v. AllenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API