Legal Opinion

Kammholz v. Allen

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 23, 1957PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CASHIN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs move for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. The answering defendants (Lester A. Kent, pursuant to stipulation, is not yet required to answer) cross-move for summary judgment and also move for dismissal of the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The facts, as pleaded in the complaint, insofar as they are relevant to this decision, are as follows:

Rudolf Lesch, an American citizen of German descent, died testate on March 9,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of BendheimNew York Surrogate's Court · 1924
  2. In re the Estate of CarringtonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
  3. Harvard Trust Co. v. Attorney Gen. of the United StatesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  4. McGrath v. WardDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
  5. Brownell, Atty. Gen. v. EdmundsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. KirschmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. In Re Trusteeship Under Will of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Security-First National Bank v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Testamentary Trust of Paszotta v. Calumet National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
  5. Gertrude (Gertrud, Trude) Kammholz, Ingeborg Kammholz v. Donald Allen, Albert HirstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API