Legal Opinion
Indian Head, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Allied Tube & Conduit Corporation, Cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 22, 1987No. 534, 735, Dockets 86-7734 and 86-7758PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUMBARD, Circuit Judge:
This case requires us to decide whether federal antitrust laws apply to attempts to influence the promulgation of a code of safety standards by private industry. In its complaint, plaintiff Indian Head, Inc. (Carlon) charged that defendant Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. had conspired to prevent inclusion of Carlon’s product in industry standards. The jury found for Carlon, and awarded it $3.8 million in damages (before trebling). Carlon now appeals from a judgment for defendant, notwithstanding the jury verdict, entered by Judge John E. Sprizzo in the Southern District on…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Union Labor Life Insurance v. PirenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. Indian Head, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Schering Corporation v. Pfizer Inc. And Ucb Pharma, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Stearns Airport Equipment Co. v. FMC Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Consolidated Metal Products, Inc. v. American Petroleum InstituteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Clamp-All Corporation v. Cast Iron Soil Pipe InstituteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.