Legal Opinion
City of Damascus v. State of Oregon
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 3, 2020No. S066939PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
41 Submitted on the briefs April 10, considered and under advisement May 7; Oregon Laws 2019, chapter 545, declared valid September 3, 2020 CITY OF DAMASCUS, James B. De Young, Jeanne Robinson, Mark Fitz, and William Wehr, Petitioners, v. STATE OF OREGON, by and through Kate Brown, Governor; and Bev Clarno, Secretary of State, Respondents. (SC S066939)
472 P3d 741
After an attempt to disincorporate the City of Damascus under the voter- initiated process requiring the approval of an absolute majority of the city’s elec- tors, as provided in ORS 221.610 and ORS 221.621, failed, the 2015…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bush v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. KitzmanOregon Supreme Court · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Portland v. BartlettOregon Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. ColgroveOregon Supreme Court · 2022
- Adelsperger v. Elkside Development LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2023
- De Young v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 2021
- Marks v. LCDCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023