Legal Opinion

De Young v. Brown

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 2021No. S067385PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

64 Argued and submitted January 16, 2020; decision of Court of Appeals affirmed, and case remanded to circuit court for further proceedings May 6, 2021 James B. De YOUNG, a resident of Damascus, Respondent on Review, v. Kate BROWN, in her official capacity as Governor of Oregon; and State of Oregon, Petitioners on Review, and CLACKAMAS COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon, Defendant-Respondent, and DAMASCUS, a municipal corporation, Defendant. (CC 16CV12583) (CA A162584) (SC S067385)

486 P3d 740

Court of Appeals awarded plaintiff attorney fees based on his success in obtaining…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Deras v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Armatta v. KitzhaberOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Gilbert v. Hoisting & Portable Engineers, Local Union No. 701Oregon Supreme Court · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adelsperger v. Elkside Development LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2025
  2. Adelsperger v. Elkside Development LLCOregon Supreme Court · 2025
  3. Bates v. Oregon Health AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. Motameni v. AdamsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API