Legal Opinion

Federal Finance Co. v. Humiston

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1965No. 37945PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

Evanescent as the moonmist from which it was named, the household china Captain Neal A. Humiston bought from Lyle L. Sparber vanished before it materialized. Sparber promised the china, but failed to deliver. Federal Finance Company, Sparber’s assignee, demanded payment. Captain Humiston said he would not pay for something he did not receive — and thereby hangs this case.

Neal Humiston and Lyle Sparber were boyhood chums in Potlatch, Idaho; they played football on the same high school team and visited back and forth in each other’s home. After high school, they separated and went off to war.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nelson v. BaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Cook v. VennigerholzWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Witzel v. TenaWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Mell v. WinslowWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Association Collectors, Inc. v. HardmanWashington Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lonsdale v. ChesterfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Black v. Evergreen Land Developers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Pacific Northwest Life Insurance Co. v. TurnbullCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  4. Emrich v. ConnellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  5. Jammeh v. HNN Associates LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API