Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Ellis C. Smith v. R. James Nicholson

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided April 5, 2005No. 01-623Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partIvers, Chief Judge

I must respectfully dissent from the majority opinion with Respect to the issue of the Court’s jurisdiction as discussed in III. B.l. The Court has jurisdiction to determine its jurisdiction over a case. See Henderson v. West, 12 Vet.App. 11 (1998). In my view, the majority’s decision to remand the question of the appellant’s entitlement to a compensable rating under the pre-1999 DC 6260 is outside this Court’s jurisdiction pursuant to 38 U.S.C. §§ 502 and 7252(b) and contrary to the Federal Circuit’s decisions in Wanner v. Principi, 370 F.3d 1124 (Fed.Cir.2004(Wanner II) and Smith v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jacob Wanner and King L. Wright, Claimants-Appellees v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  2. Henderson v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998
  3. Wanner - Wright v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2003
  4. Smith v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2003
  5. Smith v. PrincipiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API