Legal Opinion

Walker v. Hildenbrand

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1966PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

The petitioner is the daughter of T. A. Hildenbrand, deceased. She instituted this proceeding to remove Vivian E. Hildenbrand as administratrix of her father’s estate and to have herself or the Oregon Bank appointed to represent the estate. Vivian Hildenbrand had been appointed administratrix as the widow of decedent. The sole question is whether Vivian Hilden-brand was in fact the widow of decedent and thus entitled to letters of administration.

The facts are comparatively simple and free from dispute. Vivian Hildenbrand and T. A. Hildenbrand commenced living together in Oregon in 1955 and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Consolidated Underwriters v. KellyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  2. Sturgis v. SturgisOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Kelly v. Consolidated UnderwritersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Foster v. Diehl Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1955
  5. State Ex Rel. Smith v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Etienne v. DKM Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. Goldin v. GoldinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Laikola v. Engineered ConcreteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Matter of Marriage of WhartonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. Bridgman v. StoutCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API