Mushlam, Inc. v. Nazor
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered April 7 and June 3, 2008, which, insofar as appealed from, directed defendants to pay plaintiff pendente lite *472use and occupancy of $15,000 per month, commencing on May 1, 2008, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs, and the matter remanded to the Supreme Court for a hearing to determine the reasonable value of use and occupancy.
Section 220 of the Real Property Law provides that in an action for use and occupancy “[t]he landlord may recover a reasonable compensation for the use and occupation of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eli Haddad Corp. v. Cal Redmond StudioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Beacway Operating Corp. v. Concert Arts Society, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1984
- Cooper v. SchubeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Trump CPS L. L. P. v. MeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Hart-Zafra v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ricardo Hernandez v. Bryant BanksDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Mushlam, Inc. v. NazorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Split Rock Developers, LLC v. Zartab, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Westman Realty Co., LLC v. NettlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Westman Realty Co., LLC v. NettlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.