Legal Opinion
Mushlam, Inc. v. Nazor
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 14, 2013PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul G. Feinman, J.), entered on or about July 10, 2012, which, after a hearing, set interim use and occupancy for defendants’ loft unit at $3,600 per month, retroactive to May 1, 2008, unanimously modified, on the facts, to set monthly interim use and occupancy at $4,773.25, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
The hearing court properly found that plaintiff landlord’s evidence of fair market value of the premises was unreliable. The court did not exceed the scope of this Court’s remand (see Mushlam, Inc. v Nazor, 80 AD3d 471 [1st Dept 2011]) or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Michigan National Bank-Oakland v. American Centennial InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Baba-Ali v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Andejo Corp. v. South Street Seaport Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Mushlam, Inc. v. NazorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ballinteer Corp v. SNRP W. 37 LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Ballinteer Corp v. SNRP W. 37 LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Nazor v. Sydney Sol Group, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025