Columbia Savings v. Zelinger
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rovira
We granted certiorari to consider whether the court of appeals erred in concluding, contrary to detailed findings of fact of the trial court, that the petitioner, Columbia Savings (Columbia), could not set-off a portion of the proceeds of a trust account in which the respondent, Pearl Zelinger, had a beneficial interest, because the debt which formed the basis of the set-off had been discharged pursuant to section 4-3-605, 2 C.R.S. (1982). We reverse.
I
Zelinger and her sister, Gloria Springer, were named as beneficiaries of a revocable trust account established at Columbia by their mother,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bloskas v. MurraySupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Charles R. Peterson, in No. 80-2662 v. Crown Financial Corporation, a Corporation, in No. 80-2663Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. v. DowlingConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Mid-Eastern Electronics, Inc. v. First National Bank of Southern Maryland, GarnisheeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- J. J. Schaefer Livestock Hauling, Inc. v. Gretna State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Grand Junction v. Ute Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- FirsTier Bank, N. A. v. TriplettNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- NationsBanc Mortgage Corp. v. EisenhauerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- G.E. Capital Mortgage Services, Inc. v. NeelyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- GE CAPITAL MORTG. SERVICES v. NeelyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.