Legal Opinion

City of New Lisbon v. Harebo

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1937PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The original petition sets forth, (1) that the petitioner is a municipal corporation; (2) that the proceedings are -for the purpose of “extending and enhancing the beauty of the public parks, parkways, and pleasure drives of the city of New Lisbon and to create as a part thereof a pond and artificial lake to be used solely for recreational and con-servational purposes, which pond and artificial lake is to be created by constructing a dam across the ‘Large’ Lemonweir river, . . . approximately at the old damsite(3) that the hereinafter described lands cannot be acquired by gift, and that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. PrattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. Freber v. City of Beaver DamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Falkner v. Northern States Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Wisconsin Valley Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Concerned Citizens, United, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. City of Madison v. TiedemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Schumm v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API