Legal Opinion

Salera v. Schroeder

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 5, 1931No. 28,345PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

In this action for personal injury defendant had a verdict. There was no motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial, but plaintiff appeals from the judgment, raising only the question of the sufficiency of evidence to support it.

The case arises from a head-on automobile collision which occurred on trunk highway No. 1, just north of Pine City, early on the morning of July 7, 1929. Plaintiff was a front seat passenger' in a Whippet car proceeding northerly, with her husband as the chauffeur. Defendant was coming south in his Buick. The collision occurred in a fog, which defendant testifies…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dohm v. R. N. Cardozo BrotherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Schaar v. ConforthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Devoto v. United Auto Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Caudle v. ZenorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  2. Tauber v. Buffalo Lake Public School DistrictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  3. Dalzell v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Ellis v. RobbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  5. Becker v. Northland Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API