Legal Opinion

Alabama Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Stanfield

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 25, 1937No. 7 Div. 434PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

The gravamen of the plaintiff’s complaint is that “defendant negligently bottled or allowed to remain in said bottle when said coca cola was bottled, a coca cola cap or other foreign matter” which rendered the coca cola unfit for human consumption. (Italics supplied.) Birmingham Chero-Cola Bottling Co. v. Clark, 205 Ala. 678, 89 So. 64, 17 A.L.R. 667; Lewis et al. v. Linkett, 232 Ala. 233, 167 So. 286.

Defendant’s special charge, made the basis of assignment of error 1, states a sound proposition of law as applied to the case as presented on the evidence, and might well have…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Birmingham Baptist Hospital, Inc. v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Birmingham Chero-Cola Bottling Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  3. Nickerson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Porter Coal Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Birmingham Nat. Bank v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pearson v. Birmingham Transit CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  2. Travis v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Gwin v. ChurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  4. Gwin v. ChurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API