Alabama Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Stanfield
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Justice.
The gravamen of the plaintiff’s complaint is that “defendant negligently bottled or allowed to remain in said bottle when said coca cola was bottled, a coca cola cap or other foreign matter” which rendered the coca cola unfit for human consumption. (Italics supplied.) Birmingham Chero-Cola Bottling Co. v. Clark, 205 Ala. 678, 89 So. 64, 17 A.L.R. 667; Lewis et al. v. Linkett, 232 Ala. 233, 167 So. 286.
Defendant’s special charge, made the basis of assignment of error 1, states a sound proposition of law as applied to the case as presented on the evidence, and might well have…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Birmingham Baptist Hospital, Inc. v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Birmingham Chero-Cola Bottling Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Nickerson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Porter Coal Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- Birmingham Nat. Bank v. BradleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pearson v. Birmingham Transit CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
- Travis v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Gwin v. ChurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Gwin v. ChurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961