Legal Opinion
Vactor v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided November 10, 2005No. 06-05-00094-CRPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice CARTER.
After the trial court denied his motion to suppress evidence, Bruce Alan Vactor pled guilty to the offense of possession of a controlled substance (cocaine) in an amount greater than one gram but less than four grams, a third-degree felony. See Tex. Health & Safety Code ANN. § 481.102(3)(D) (Vernon Supp.2005) (cocaine is group 1 drug); § 481.115(c) (Vernon 2003) (offense of possessing penalty group 1 drug). There was no negotiated plea agreement, and Vactor’s punishment range was enhanced by virtue of his plea of “true” to having been previously and finally…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Osborne v. Harris CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
- Terry Eugene Glenn, Sr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015
- Grissom v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
- Andrew Bleckley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006
- Benfer v. City Of Baytown, TexasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.