Legal Opinion · Dissent

King v. Loveable Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 7, 1987No. 86-1723Published

1DissentSharp, Judge

I would grant King’s petition for issuance of a writ of certiorari,1 to review a discovery order requiring her to expose stains on her breasts to the attorneys for The Loveable Company (manufacturers of an allegedly defective brassiere), Sullivan-Carson (manufacturers of the elastic material in the brassiere) and Luithlen Dye Company (manufacturers of the dye used in the brassiere). The suit below involves King’s claim for damages allegedly suffered when she purchased and wore a black brassiere which permanently left a dark outline on the part of her skin covered by the brassiere.

The court’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. BotsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Hawaiian Inn v. Snead Const. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Depfer v. WalkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  5. Powell v. WingardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API