Legal Opinion

Black v. City of Peru

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1968No. 20,750PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

On April 27, 1965, the appellee, City of Peru, Indiana, a municipal corporation, filed an affidavit and complaint in the Peru City Court charging the appellant, James Black, with a violation of the Junk Car Removal Ordinance No. 40, 1964, which ordinance had been duly enacted by the City Council of the City of Peru, Indiana.

The appellant entered an appearance to the action and filed a motion to quash the complaint and affidavit, which motion was overruled by the Judge of the Peru City Court.

On the 18th day of February, 1966, the appellant was arraigned in the Peru City Court. The cause was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McFarlan v. Fowler Bank City Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Ryason v. DuntenIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Haas v. Holder, TrusteeIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Rogers v. Youngblood, JudgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Watson's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Black v. City of PeruIndiana Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API