Lucas v. Vulcan Iron Works
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
At Law. Action by M. A. Ltjcas against the Vulcan Iron Works and others. On exceptions to affidavits of defense and rule for judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
WITMER, District Judge.
[1] An action in assumpsit has been instituted, founded on a recovery against defendants in the circuit court of Johnson county, Ark. Affidavits of defense have been filed, which the court is requested to declare as insufficient and direct judgment for plaintiff notwithstanding. In the solution of the matters presented the court is confined to the pleadings, consisting of plaintiff’s statement of claim, with exemplification of record of the suit forming the basis of this action, and the affidavits filed. Erom this record it appears, that tire original suit was begun in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bissell v. BriggsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
- Baxley v. LinahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1851
- Campbell v. R. Steele & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849
- Ladd v. Watkins & VinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ackerman v. TobinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Irving Trust Co. v. Climax Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Shulman v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1961
- Squire v. Simon, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Jefferson County1938