Legal Opinion

Schulman v. O'Reilly-Lando

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided August 4, 1988PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

226 N.J. Super. 626 (1988)

545 A.2d 241

AARON SCHULMAN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

BERNADETTE O'REILLY-LANDO, JERSEY CITY BOARD OF SCHOOL ESTIMATE AND MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 4, 1988.

Decided August 4, 1988.

Before Judges KING, GAULKIN and GRUCCIO.

Richard A. Friedman argued the cause for defendant-appellant Bernadette O'Reilly-Lando (Ruhlman, Butrym & Friedman, attorneys, Richard A. Friedman and Carol Trovato, on the brief).

Paul W. Mackey, First Assistant Corporation Counsel, argued the cause for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ButlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  2. Reilly v. OzzardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Dacunzo v. EdgyeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  4. McGlynn v. New Jersey Public Broadcasting AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. Kaufman v. PannuccioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Oswin v. ShawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  3. Oswin v. ShawNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
  4. Brown v. PuenteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
  5. Royal Food Distributors, Inc. v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API