Legal Opinion

Bunn v. City of Atlanta

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 11, 1941No. 13800PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

The Court of Appeals, and not the Supreme Court, has jurisdiction of a writ of error brought to review the ruling of the superior court in refusing to grant a certiorari which sought to set aside a conviction, in the recorder’s court of the City of Atlanta, of violation of an ordinance of said city. This result is not altered by the fact that the only defense presented was an attack on the constitutionality of the ordinance. Constitution of Georgia, art. 6, see. 2, par. 5 (Code, § 2-3005); Thompson v. Atlanta, 176 Ga. 489 (168 S. E. 312); Stafford v. Valdosta, 178…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Maner v. DykesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  2. Thompson v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Forbes v. Mayor of SavannahSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  4. Stafford v. City of ValdostaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  5. Elliott v. City Council of AugustaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beard v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  2. Bunn v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API