Legal Opinion
Glazing Health & Welfare Fund v. Lamek
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 21, 2018No. 16-16155PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dissent by Judge Gleason
ORDER
*909The opinion filed on March 21, 2018, and appearing at 885 F.3d 1197, is hereby amended as follows: Footnote 7, which appears at page 1200 and which reads < The dissent argues that Bos I's holding ... over the plan asset to make him a fiduciary).>, is deleted.
With the foregoing amendment, Judge Friedland voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Clifton so recommended. Judge Gleason recommended granting the petition for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers Local 2 v. Moulton Masonry & Construction, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. Harris Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re Gregory Dewitt Cantrell, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Navarre v. Luna (In Re Luna)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Board of Trustees of the Glazing Health and Welfare Fund v. Z-Glass, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2020
- Thondukolam v. Corteva, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020