Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Roman Catholic Bishop v. Hill
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided May 8, 1939No. 3268PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In this proceeding petitioners challenge the validity of sections 7 and 8 of ordinance No. 433 (the zoning ordinance) of the city of Reno, upon the ground that they infringe sections 1, 4 and 8 of article I of the constitution of Nevada, and the fourteenth amendment of the constitution of the United States, U. S. C. A.
Section 7 of said zoning ordinance reads as follows: “It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, association or corporation to erect, build, alter, or enlarge any building or structure in the Residential District, not intended for residential purposes, except sheds which…
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by29 opinions
- Diocese of Rochester v. Planning BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Milwaukie Co. of Jehovah's Witnesses v. MullenOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Synod of Ohio of United Lutheran Church in America v. JosephOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Village of Orchard LakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Bd. of Zoning Ap. of Decatur v. Decatur, Ind. Co. of Jehovah's WitnessesIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.