Legal Opinion

People v. Hampton

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 22, 1984PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum..

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The trial court charged the jury that if it found that either defendant did not act in concert with the other then it must acquit both defendants. When the jury found defendant Coley not guilty and the defendant Hampton guilty the verdict was clearly repugnant under the court’s charge.

The determination as to the repugnancy of the verdict is made solely on the basis of the trial court’s charge and not on the correctness of those instructions (People v Tucker, 55 NY2d 1). Because an examination of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. TuckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. CarbonellNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People v. MuhammadNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. People v. GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. The People v. Dwight R. DeLeeNew York Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API