Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. King

Allegheny County Court of Quarter Sessions

Decided August 22, 1963No. 600PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraff, P. J.

(Thirty-Third Judicial District, Specially Presiding),

Defendant, W. L. King, was indicted, charged with the crime of libel. Upon trial of the case the jury returned a verdict of not guilty, and directed that defendant pay the costs. This matter now comes before us upon a motion in arrest of judgment.

The jury returned a verdict of not guilty upon November 9th, without disposing of the costs. They were then sent back for further consideration, to determine who should pay the costs, and upon the same day returned a verdict that defendant should pay the costs. Sentence was then imposed, that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Zorach v. ClausonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Beauharnais v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Davis v. BeasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Purcell v. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GiaccioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Commonwealth v. GiaccioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Commonwealth v. GiaccioSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Commonwealth v. GiaccioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API