St. Croix County Department of Health and Human Services v. Michael D.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Dissent
SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, J. and ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J.
¶ 85. (dissenting). Stare decisis (Latin for "let the decision stand") is a basic tenet of the rule of law.1 Although stare decisis is not a mechanical formula requiring blind adherence to precedent, departing from precedent requires special justification,2 and " [n]o change in the law is justified by a change in the membership of the court or a case with more egregious facts."3
¶ 86. Although the majority opinion states that it "adher[es] to the important principle of stare decisis,"4 it does not. The majority opinion, without special…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Bartholomew v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund & Compcare Health Services InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. StevensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- Noffke Ex Rel. Swenson v. BakkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. HigginbothamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.