Legal Opinion · Dissent

St. Croix County Department of Health and Human Services v. Michael D.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 2016No. 2014AP002431Published

1Dissent

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, J. and ANN WALSH BRADLEY, J.

¶ 85. (dissenting). Stare decisis (Latin for "let the decision stand") is a basic tenet of the rule of law.1 Although stare decisis is not a mechanical formula requiring blind adherence to precedent, departing from precedent requires special justification,2 and " [n]o change in the law is justified by a change in the membership of the court or a case with more egregious facts."3

¶ 86. Although the majority opinion states that it "adher[es] to the important principle of stare decisis,"4 it does not. The majority opinion, without special…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Bartholomew v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund & Compcare Health Services InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. StevensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Noffke Ex Rel. Swenson v. BakkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. HigginbothamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API