Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Delaware County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 2005No. 2004-1417PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} The owners of five adjoining parcels of land in Delaware County challenge the county auditor’s conclusion that the land did not qualify for a reduced property-tax rate for tax year 2002 under the Current Agricultural Use Value (“CAUV”) program described in R.C. 5713.30 through 5713.99. The property in question — identified in the Delaware County Auditor’s records as parcels numbered 419-130-01-001-000, 419-130-01-002-000, 419-130-01-003-000, 419-130-01-004-000, and 419-140-02-006-000 — covers approximately 240 acres in the Delaware City School District.

{¶ 2} The county auditor’s office…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Jones v. FarrarOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Simmons v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Corporate Exchange Buildings IV & V, Ltd. Partnership v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. Ragozine v. ShakerOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Renner v. Tuscarawas County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. RNG Properties, Ltd. v. Summit Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Boggs v. Ohio Real Estate CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. 2200 Carnegie, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Internatl. Paper Co. v. Testa (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Hersh v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of RevisionOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API