Legal Opinion

University of Notre Dame v. Sebelius

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided December 20, 2013No. 3:13-cv-01276-PPSPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

PHILIP P. SIMON, Chief Judge.

Notre Dame seeks a preliminary injunction against enforcement of the part of the Affordable Care Act that requires employers to provide employees with health insurance that covers contraceptive services. Notre Dame objects to providing contraceptive care on religious grounds, and that of course is its prerogative. But the law provides religious employers like Notre Dame an out by allowing it to file a certification saying it refuses to provide such services. If Notre Dame takes that tack,…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ave Maria Foundation v. SebeliusDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  2. East Texas Baptist University v. SebeliusDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
  3. Diocese of Fort Wayne-South Bend, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2013
  4. Michigan Catholic Conference v. SebeliusDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2013
  5. Schools v. SebeliusDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API