Legal Opinion

Lancaster v. McDonald

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1886PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Douglas County. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStrahan, J.

The plaintiff commenced his action against the defendant before a justice of the peace of Yoncalla Precinct, in Douglas County, to.recover against the defendant §576.00, where he had judgment for the full amount claimed, from which the defendant appealed to the- circuit court. The defendant’s notice of appeal is as follows :

^ In the Justioe’s Court for Yoncalla Precinct, Douglas County, State of Oregon : J. II. Lancaster, Plaintiff, v. James McDonald, Defendant. Civil action to recover money. To J. II. *265Lancaster, and C. A. Sehlbrede, his attorney: You are hereby notified that James McDonald,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Neppach v. JordanOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Moorhouse v. DonicaOregon Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Lewis v. LewisOregon Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Christian v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Luse v. LuseOregon Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Haag v. BurnsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  2. State ex rel. Maltby v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Ream v. HowardOregon Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Kingsbury v. Pacific Coal & Transp. Co.District Court, D. Alaska · 1906
  5. City of Colton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API