Legal Opinion

Uriega v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided March 10, 2004No. 04-03-00397-CRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

PHYLIS J. SPEEDLIN, Justice.

Juan Antonio Uriega (“Uriega”) was convicted of the felony offense of driving while intoxicated (“DWI”). In his sole issue on appeal, Uriega asserts that the trial court lacked felony jurisdiction because one of the prior DWI convictions used to elevate his current offense from a misdemeanor to a felony was too remote. We vacate the judgment and dismiss the indictment.

Background

Uriega had two prior DWI convictions in 1979 and 1994 when he was charged with a third DWI committed on May 21, 2002. Under the statute, the State was required to prove…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gibson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  2. Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
  3. Bobby Doyle Getts v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2003
  4. Anderson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. Gerald Duane Howard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
  3. Gerald Duane Howard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
  4. Getts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  5. Getts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API