Legal Opinion · Dissent

Getts v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 26, 2005No. PD-0093-04Published

1Dissent

COCHRAN, J.,

filed a dissenting in which KELLER, P.J. and MEYERS, J., joined.

I respectfully dissent. “Our constitutional duty, of course, is to effectuate what *159the Legislature intended when it enacted the statute.”1 It is beyond peradventure that the Texas Legislature did not intend to enact any dramatic substantive changes to the felony DWI enhancement statute in its 2001 amendment. The infelicitous language found in the amendment to section 49.09(e) of the Texas Penal Code is a drafting mistake and the result of a last-minute floor amendment which promised “no substantive change” in the law.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Kutzner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Ex Parte KuesterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API