Legal Opinion

Dickens v. Autozone, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided October 23, 2020No. 1:18-cv-00162Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION WILLIAM DICKENS and PLAINTIFFS KARLA DICKENS v. CAUSE NO. 1:18CV162-LG-JCG A-1 AUTO PARTS & REPAIR INC., ET AL. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BEFORE THE COURT is the [369] Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Trinity Marine Products, Inc. (“Trinity”). The issues have been fully briefed by the parties. The Court finds that the law of either Delaware or Tennessee applies to the issue of successor liability under Section 145 of the Restatement…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977
  5. RSR Corp. v. International InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API