Legal Opinion

Urban Redevelopment Condemnation Case

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 5, 1961No. Appeals, 198 and 207PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr;'Justice-Musmanno,

On September 18, 1959, tbe Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh condemned certain property in the Second Ward of the City of Pittsburgh and, as the result of proceedings before the board of viewers, agreed to pay $7500 to the owners of the property. A dispute now arising :as to the identity of the owners, the Authority paid the money into the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, where it presently awaits authoritative distribution. The contenders for the amount in escrow are the County of Allegheny, the City of Pittsburgh, and the School District of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. United States v. MerriamSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Schmuck v. HartmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. Commonwealth v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Scranton v. O'Malley Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chartiers Valley School District v. Virginia Mansions Apartments, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Kelly v. BellCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1969
  3. School District of Monessen v. Farnham & Pfile Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. In Re: Appeal of Springfield Hospital ~ Appeal of: Prospect Crozer, LLCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Mostoller v. Pile, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API